The
Israel of Netanyahu follows them as well. It was expected. When Yitzhak Rabin ruled, Israel was very active in UNESCO, the intellectual Organization of
the multilateral democratic System of the United Nations. But he died
assassinated and, since then, the chances of success in the peace process are
vanishing.
The
United States withdraws from UNESCO
because the Republican Party, with hegemonic ambitions, is incompatible with a multilateral democratic system. Already in 1919, they did unachievable the activities of an efficient
League of Nations because they
imposed the immense contradiction that the United States were never members of the League of
Nations! created by an American
President, Woodrow Wilson.
And
then they have always been hostile to
the excellent design of the United
Nations System created by the
Democratic President, Franklin D.
Roosevelt...
In
the 80s, at the end of the "Cold War",
when was finally possible
to empower the necessary expansiveness, perspective and efficiency to multilateralism,
providing it with proper
personal, security, technical and
financial resources, President Reagan with the Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher
as an obedient acolyte, left UNESCO and created the plutocratic groups (G6, G7,
G8 ...) set up by the richest countries,
to marginalize the United Nations, not subscribing the Convention on Human
Rights of Children in 1989 -it is the only country in the world that has not
subscribed it-, placing the World Trade Organization directly outside the
System ... and then invading Iraq without the authorization of the Security
Council ... And the neoliberalism has resulted
as well in the decrease of the Aid for Development increasing the number of
emigrants because in their countries of origin they die of hunger.
It is an intolerable fact, from all points
of view, that each day more than 4 billion dollars are invested in military
expenditures and armament, while thousands of people, most of them children
from 1 to 5 years old, die of starvation and abandonment.
This
daily colossal contribution to the economy of war has seemed scarce to
President Trump, who
requested an increase very quickly. And the European countries, including Spain, all of them
unsupportive with the immigrants and refugees -more than 6,000 dead in the Mediterranean in 2016- rushed to increase their defense
investments. And all have been silent when Trump has announced that he would
not implement the Paris Agreements on Climate Change, which constitutes an
intolerable threat to the quality of the Earth habitability and, therefore, to
the intergenerational legacy.
I
regret they leave UNESCO because millions of American children and young people will receive a
biased education -in some Republican
States it is obligatory to explain creationism!- typical of an educational scheme that confuses
education ("being free and responsible") with training, knowledge with
information and information with news. And I especially regret for Higher Education, as it is well known that the US has 2 dozen top universities... but
with hundreds of universities that leave much to be desired because, among
other things, education is confused with professional learning.
It
is necessary that world citizens react quickly -tomorrow may be too late- demanding
compliance by the United States with the Paris Agreements on Climate Change and
the Sustainable Development Goals. Otherwise,
it must be a great popular outcry -now that we have no excuse to keep an
accomplice silence- which, aware that otherwise all humanity would suffer
the consequences, requires President Trump to redress.The convinced supremacist, does not conceive that all
human beings are equal in dignity and that no one can irreversibly tarnish their future. It is obvious that what worries me is not that the United States withdraws UNESCO again, but that the
world as a whole, without the assistance of a strong and effective United Nations, abandons
itself to its fate... especially when we
know most certainly that points of no return can be reached.
What
does the European Union refrain of telling clearly to President Trump that
their trade relations could be affected very severely if he does not comply
with the Paris Agreements? What do
the most concerned citizens to wait, looking to the eyes of their children and descendants, to say that they will not admit that
their intergenerational legacy deteriorates?
Now
we can express ourselves: crime of silence.
0 comments
Post a Comment